PDA

View Full Version : History of the Glock


DanaC
01-15-2011, 03:39 PM
Excerpt of a rather lengthy article. Has an anti-gun bias over-all, but still an interesting look at the history of the Glock.

For the complete article, see -

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/11_04/b4212052185280.htm

Cover Story January 13, 2011, 12:45AM EST

Glock: America's Gun
How Austria's Glock became the weapon of choice for U.S. cops, Second Amendment enthusiasts, and mass killers like the alleged Tucson gunman Jared Loughner

By Paul M. Barrett

For all the anguish and outcry in the days after a community college dropout named Jared Loughner allegedly sprayed a Tucson crowd with 33 bullets from a semiautomatic pistol, one response was notably absent: any sense that America's latest shooting spree, which killed six people and wounded 14, including Representative Gabrielle Giffords, would bring new restrictions on the right to own or carry large-capacity, rapid-fire weapons.

The gun control debate has vanished from American politics, but it wasn't always so invisible. Twenty years ago, when another apparently deranged man fired a semiautomatic pistol into a crowd, killing 23 people in Killeen, Tex., politicians rushed the microphones to denounce the weapon itself as "a death machine," as Representative John Conyers Jr., a Michigan Democrat, put it on the floor of the House. A so-called assault weapons ban became law three years later. That law has now expired. Since Loughner's attack, liberal pundits, gun control advocates, and congressional backbenchers have been talking about instituting new controls. The voices that count, however, including President Barack Obama and the congressional leaders in both parties, have had nothing to say on the subject.

Their silence is just one measure of how thoroughly Gaston Glock—a former curtain-rod maker from Austria whose company manufactured the pistols used in Tucson and Killeen—has managed to dominate not just the American handgun market, but America's gun consciousness. Before Glock arrived on the scene in the mid-1980s, the U.S. was a revolver culture, a place where most handguns fired five or six shots at a measured pace, then needed to be reloaded one bullet at a time. With its large ammunition capacity, quick reloading, light trigger pull, and utter reliability, the Glock was hugely innovative—and an instant hit with police and civilians alike. Headquartered in Deutsch-Wagram, Austria, the company says it now commands 65 percent of the American law enforcement market, including the FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration. It also controls a healthy share of the overall $1 billion U.S. handgun market, according to analysis of production and excise tax data. (Precise figures aren't available because Glock and several large rivals, including Beretta and Sig Sauer, are privately held.)

-----------
Polls show that even most people who support stricter gun control do not believe that such laws reduce crime generally. "At some basic level," Dennis Henigan, vice-president of the Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, acknowledges in his 2009 book, Lethal Logic, "the public is convinced that 'when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns.' This belief cannot help but diminish the intensity of public support for further gun restrictions."

The rise of the Glock and other semiautomatic handguns cannot be linked to variations in overall crime rates. But that doesn't mean it would be pointless to take small steps to reduce mayhem, such as restricting magazine capacity. One lesson of Tucson is that there is a difference between a 33-round clip and an 8- or 10-round clip. The only way to make a limit work, though, would be to ban the manufacture, sale, and possession of all clips larger than the cap. Reviving a porous 1990s-style limit would backfire. Representative Carolyn McCarthy (D-N.Y.), among others, is working on a new restriction. "We are optimistic it will plug the loopholes in the 1994 law," says Kristen Rand, legislative director of the Violence Policy Center, a gun control group that is consulting on the bill. Even if quite modest, however, the provision seems unlikely to receive serious consideration in a Republican-controlled House of Representatives. Glock's victory, and that of its industry, won't be reversed anytime soon.

With Michael Riley. This article draws on Bloomberg Businessweek Assistant Managing Editor Paul M. Barrett's reporting for a forthcoming book on Glock and its influence in America, to be published by Crown in 2012.

Sam Dunham
01-15-2011, 06:28 PM
I carried the Harley Davidson of all Pistols for 15 years. I remember when the G pistol came out and looked at it like it was another el cheapo "Crunchenticker".

As it gained popularity I became interested. I used to shoot pin shoots all the time with a 1911 with a compensater and heavy 255 LC bullets ahead of a heavy charge of Bullseye.

Then they changed the location of the pens for a Minor caliber shoot. HUMMMMMM Out and bought one of these G guns in 9mm when that was all they offered.
Loaded up some heavy 147's and proceeded to win the Pin shoot.

I still never considered it a "Serious Gun" because of the Caliber.
I continued to carry my 1911 as I had for the last 15 years.
Then they made a 45 G gun.
Glock sent me one to torture, bad mistake I said to myself.
I did everything to the gun. The only thing that hung it up was if mud got into the striker channel.
Thousand of rounds, No Mals, No failures, shot dirty all the time, never did clean it. 5000 rounds of all configurations.
I had made a Baretta 92 fail in a similar test, broke a trigger spring.
Took the trigger spring out of the G gun, still worked. Had to flip the trigger manually forward.
The only fault a G gun has is the lack of an optional exterior safety. You can shoot the "jewels" off if you hang the trigger on something.

Then My Dept bought G guns, I had to carry one. I STILL would not turn my 1911 loose. I secretly carried it in my belt if I got a bad call. Finally after another few thousand rounds through this gun, I began to trust it. I carried a 21 SF for the last five years I was on the line. The last time I qualified with this pistol, I shot a 496-47X, 500 possible. I was 52 years old and smoked every other Deputy on the Dept. Some carried Wilson and Nighthawk 1911's and other makes of 1911's. Combat shooting is accomplished just as fast, just as quick with a G pistol as any other once the Operator learns the system. I learned to rebound to resistance, then shoot again. The most absolute dumbest thing on any pistol is the Double action first shot, then single action set after the first shot. I like the SIG 220 family but, They are too slow in competition. If it is too slow in competition, it's too slow on the street! In my opinion, The best fighting pistol in the world may still be the 1911 but, I would take a 21 SF over any other. I have 13 rounds for sure, 26 on my belt, and it shoots better than I can, which is true of most people. I have to admit that I do like the Croation pistol, Springfield XD in 45. The reason I could never get on it seriously is the parts and takedown. G pistols only have 34 parts, no screws, and all the springs are coils. The Sig, Beretta, and XD have music wire single springs that might break. The 1911 has all coils sept the leaf in the back which never breaks. A 1911 might work with hardball out of the box but needs attention and tune to make it reliable. The G gun works out of the box for a fraction of the price and will never let you down unless you mess with it.

DanaC
01-17-2011, 02:42 AM
Thanks, Sam. Great 'first-hand' input.

Esquire
01-17-2011, 07:37 AM
Great posts. Thanks. Really.

Dang it!

Now I have to try and feel less remorse about letting go of my Glock and try to affirm myself on my SP2340 and his little brother, my P232 sl.

stevelong
01-17-2011, 10:52 AM
My first experience with GLOCK was while watching an old Western years ago and the guy croaked in the street, the old DOC was looking into his eyes, and the last words the guy bubbled & uttered was something like "guh-l-ock" and he closed his eyes.
Really.