tuffshot
12-15-2009, 08:10 AM
Marketing plays a big role in product promotion. Anything from archery (compounds) to FITA rigs, to golf clubs etc. In all the winners of competition and sponsorship marketing play a major role on which piece of equipment comes out on top.
The one thing I have noticed is that in the traditional relhm the promtional aspects is about the same yet without the usual marketing of a winner of competition. It has been left up to those who want to know what bow of said competions was shooting.
What is the best longbow for competition was asked in another thread on our forum. The responses were given from some of the best shooters and competitors on this site. The list was not all that big for a competitive longbow, but I am sure has influenced some sales of the bows recommended.
Competitors like Redbow, Steve Morely and Larry Yein have been a mojor influence. There are exceptions to this, I know of one gentleman who felt he could not find a bow that suited him so he makes his own. For some that is how a traditional bow gets started.
There is one other aspect in all of this though, there are some other bows with competitor quialities that never get the recognition they may deserve because there is so little known about them. I sometimes wonder if marketing stepped in, would it make a larger impact on todays bowyers recognition instead of depending on more word of mouth?
I didn't mean to leave the recurve shooters and their choices but the longbow was a good example competitors influence.
The one thing I have noticed is that in the traditional relhm the promtional aspects is about the same yet without the usual marketing of a winner of competition. It has been left up to those who want to know what bow of said competions was shooting.
What is the best longbow for competition was asked in another thread on our forum. The responses were given from some of the best shooters and competitors on this site. The list was not all that big for a competitive longbow, but I am sure has influenced some sales of the bows recommended.
Competitors like Redbow, Steve Morely and Larry Yein have been a mojor influence. There are exceptions to this, I know of one gentleman who felt he could not find a bow that suited him so he makes his own. For some that is how a traditional bow gets started.
There is one other aspect in all of this though, there are some other bows with competitor quialities that never get the recognition they may deserve because there is so little known about them. I sometimes wonder if marketing stepped in, would it make a larger impact on todays bowyers recognition instead of depending on more word of mouth?
I didn't mean to leave the recurve shooters and their choices but the longbow was a good example competitors influence.